Published 08-23-04
Submitted by Sierra Legal Defence Fund
"Under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) is required to assess major project modifications before issuing any approval," said Sierra Club of Canada's Dianne Pachal. "It's critical that DFO take a fresh look at the project because the nature of the project has fundamentally changed along with its environmental impacts."
On behalf of the Canadian Nature Federation (CNF), Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development, Jasper Environmental Association, Alberta Wilderness Association and the Sierra Club of Canada, Sierra Legal Defence Fund applied for a Judicial Review at the Federal Court late last week.
Although the initial construction of the mine is underway, no federal authorizations have been issued. The groups argue that, as a result, there is no mechanism to implement the mitigation measures the federal government assured Canadians would be in place to lessen the mine's significant adverse impacts.
The original project would have processed the raw coal on site, however the new project includes expanding the mine area to take in the McLeod River valley and the construction of a high-speed, 24-hour haul road along its length to truck raw coal 22 km north to the Luscar Mine for processing. It is the very development the company had earlier ruled out due to social and environmental impacts and technological limitations.
"The proposed high-speed road between Luscar and Cheviot would act as an impassable barrier for wildlife and would also impact fish and migratory bird habitat," said Glen Semenchuk from CNF. "DFO has a legal duty to examine all of the modifications to the project, as well as a duty to ensure that mitigation measures are implemented."
Cardinal River Coals originally proposed the massive open-pit mine in 1996. A federal-provincial review panel subsequently examined the proposal and found that the project would negatively impact fish and fish habitat, migratory birds, the terrain, First Nations' traditional uses of the area and those people seeking wildlands. The adverse impacts included two species designated as 'at risk' by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) - the grizzly bear and harlequin duck. Despite these impacts, the panel recommended that DFO approve the project, as they concluded the jobs and coal production would outweigh the environmental losses. However, the groups note that the new project, while requiring a larger area, will mine less than half the coal and employ only a quarter to half the people of the earlier project.
Previously, Sierra Legal successfully challenged the panel's 1997 findings and DFO's approval on behalf of several citizens' groups. In 2000, after further review, the joint review panel issued a second report, again recommending approval of the Cheviot project. However, that project was not developed and in August 2002 Cardinal River Coal launched the modified Cheviot project.
The case is expected to be heard in early 2005.
Canadian Nature Federation:
Glen Semenchuk (780) 427-8124 or
Julie Gelfand (613) 562-3447
Sierra Club of Canada:
Dianne Pachal, Alberta Wilderness Director (403) 234-7368
Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development:
Chris Severson-Baker, Env. Policy (403) 269-3344 ext. 101
Sierra Legal Defence Fund:
Justin Duncan, Staff Lawyer (416) 368-7533 ext. 22
Jasper Environmental Association:
Jill Seaton (780) 852-4152
Alberta Wilderness Association: (403) 283-2025