Get the latest delivered to your inbox
Privacy Policy

Now Reading

New Report On Global Governance Makes Grim Reading As World Bank And IMF Prepare To Meet In Washington

New Report On Global Governance Makes Grim Reading As World Bank And IMF Prepare To Meet In Washington

Published 04-21-04

Submitted by World Economic Forum

Geneva, Switzerland - A comprehensive report released on the eve of the World Bank's spring meeting in Washington has concluded that the world community is simply not doing nearly what it could and should to tackle poverty, war, ignorance and disease. A team of over 40 experts from around the world, overseen by a distinguished steering committee, has concluded that governments, international organizations, business and civil society are engaging in only about one-third of the effort necessary to realize the United Nations Millennium Declaration Goals.

The first annual report of the World Economic Forum's Global Governance Initiative (GGI) represents a year-long independent analysis by seven groups of some of the world's leading experts in the areas of peace and security, poverty, hunger, education, health, environment and human rights. In September 2000, at the Millennium Summit of the United Nations, leaders from 189 countries endorsed a set of objectives in these areas, many with a specific deadline of 2015. This report provides a 'benchmark' on efforts to tackle these goals.

As well as comprehensive analysis, the report also marks efforts by the international community on a scale of 0 to 10 on such issues as poverty, health, hunger, security, education, the environment and human rights. The report finds that during 2003 in no single area did the international community warrant more than a score of 4 on a scale of 0 to 10 measuring the level of effort and cooperation necessary to achieve the goals.

The report highlights a number of disturbing trends. For example, the proportion of hungry people is likely to increase in the Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. At least 96 countries are not on track to reach the target of universal primary education by 2015, and 104 million children are not even enrolled in primary school. Financial donors have fallen short in providing the US$ 300 million necessary to sustain commitments under the Fast Track Initiative, which is the global effort to spur real progress on education.

There is also little evidence that the world is making a serious effort to curb greenhouse gas emissions, despite the fact that they can harm agricultural production, water supply and forests, and lead to vector-borne diseases. Although 12% of the earth's land surface is now ostensibly protected, the world is spending less than US$ 7 billion a year to make that protection meaningful, compared to the over US$ 30 billion needed to properly implement protections.

In a number of areas, however, substantial progress is visible. In health, the Roll Back Malaria campaign has tripled international spending to more than US$ 200 million and has led to cost-effective technologies and greater investment in basic infrastructure. Aggressive domestic policies and private initiatives have helped a number of countries move toward halving their poverty levels by 2015. China in particular made significant strides by increasing fiscal spending on poverty reduction and launching food-for-work programmes. Little noted in 2003 was the positive sign that no new civil wars broke out, indicating an improvement in the international community's conflict resolution and prevention capabilities.

Achieving success in other areas, however, will require the world's rich countries to match their verbal commitments with resources and action. Of particular concern, notes the report, was that the WTO Cancun negotiations failed to agree on a framework to open markets to agricultural products from the developing world, leaving them at a continuing disadvantage.

Commenting on the findings, Richard Samans, Managing Director and Head of the World Economic Forum's Global Institute for Partnership and Governance said, "This is the first year that we have produced such a report, and although the 'headline' findings are disappointing, it does at least point the way to how improvements can be made. We hope that this report will become a benchmark against which the international community can begin to measure their success or failure in dealing with the fundamental problems of the world. The report shines an independent spotlight on the large gap between our collective aspirations and actions."

While the report dedicates a chapter to each of the issues, it also highlights interdependencies among them. Better education, for example, has proven instrumental in spurring economic growth, which in turn offers a sustainable path toward alleviating poverty and hunger. However, AIDS is killing teachers faster than they can be replaced in parts of Africa, where education for girls proves one of the surest means to fight the disease. An additional US$ 5.6 billion (from the current US$ 1.5 billion) in development assistance is needed annually to support basic education, the report states.

"The attempt to link the security sector with the development agenda is particularly significant. Focusing on the security and development nexus will go a long way in pushing the global agenda for the benefit of all who suffer daily threats and poverty," said Sadako Ogata, President of the Japan International Cooperation Agency.

The Global Governance Initiative uniquely evaluates the contributions of the private sector and civil society in addition to governments and international organizations toward achieving the goals. Sir Mark Moody-Stuart, Chairman of Anglo American Plc, commented, "All elements of society need to work much more effectively if we are to meet the goals by 2015; no one group on its own can achieve the goals."

"To achieve human dignity for all, internationally agreed targets must be considered simultaneously and through coordinated strategies which identify the different responsibilities of all actors in society," adds Mary Robinson, Executive Director of the Ethical Globalization Initiative.

Please view (PDF file) for your information the Global Governance Executive Summary 2004

Notes to Editors
Steering Committee members: Strobe Talbott, President, The Brookings Institution; Maurice Strong, President, University for Peace; Yotaro Kobayashi, Chairman, Fuji Xerox Company; Mirai Chatterjee, Coordinator, Self-Employed Women's Association; Walter Fust, Director-General, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation; John English, Executive Director, Center for International Governance Innovation; Jim Balsillie, Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer, Research in Motion; Simon Maxwell, Director, Overseas Development Institute; Youssou N'Dour, Artist and Chairman, Youth Network for Development Foundation; Moises Naim, Editor-in-Chief, Foreign Policy magazine; Kumi Naidoo, CEO, Civicus; Surin Pitsuwan, Member, Royal Thai Parliament; Mary Robinson, Executive Director, Ethical Globalization Initiative; Sir Mark Moody-Stuart, Chairman, Anglo American Plc; Njongonkulu Ndungane, Anglican Archbishop of Cape Town, South Africa; Carlos Bulgheroni, Chairman, Bridas Corporation; François Heisbourg, Director, Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique; Christine Loh, Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Civic Exchange; John Ruggie, Director, Center for Business and Government, John F. Kennedy School of Government; Ismail Serageldin, Director, Bibliotheca Alexandrina; Yu Yongding, Director, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences; Tim Wirth, President, UN Foundation; Robert Archer, Executive Director, International Council on Human Rights Policy; Christopher Colclough, Professorial Fellow, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex; Gareth Evans, President, International Crisis Group; Jonathan Lash, President, World Resources Institute; Nora Lustig, President, University of the Americas Puebla; Al Sommer, Dean, School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University; Per Pinstrup-Andersen, Professor of Food, Nutrition and Public Policy, Cornell University; Ann Florini, Senior Fellow, The Brookings Institution (ex officio); José María Figueres, Co-Chief Executive Officer, World Economic Forum (ex officio); and Klaus Schwab, Executive Chairman, World Economic Forum (ex officio).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The World Economic Forum is the foremost global community of business, political, intellectual and other leaders of society committed to improving the state of the world.

Incorporated as a foundation, and based in Geneva, Switzerland, the World Economic Forum is impartial and not-for-profit; it is tied to no political, partisan or national interests. The Forum has NGO consultative status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations. (http://www.weforum.org)

World Economic Forum logo

World Economic Forum

World Economic Forum

www.weforum.org

More from World Economic Forum

Join today and get the latest delivered to your inbox