As energy becomes scarcer innovative forms of extraction have emerged. Most prominent among these due to their controversy are fracking and oil sands.

Obama in his State of the Union address backed fracking alongside additional regulation requiring companies disclose the chemicals used in the process.

Keystone XL did not receive the Presidents backing amid claims the Congress imposed deadline did not give sufficient time to weigh the social and environmental impact. The more cynical might suggest it was simply too controversial a decision to take in an election year.

Regardless of the motives behind each decision the question must be posed, has the extractives industry ability to operate in increasingly complex and difficult environments been matched by implementation of a sufficiently robust social and environmental policy?

Fracking in the USA is seen as a potential holy grail on the road to diversifying energy supply and reducing foreign energy dependence. Environmentalists remind us of the potentially devastating harm fracking can cause to drinking water. Deepwater Horizon serves as a poignant reminder of failed risk mitigation as BP struggled to contain a leak occurring thousands of feet below the ocean floor.

The risk versus opportunity conundrum extends well beyond energy extraction. In the mining sector operations now take place in extreme environments ranging from the Canadian Arctic right through to conflict affected zones such as DR Congo and Liberia. Here risk mitigation isn't just environmental but also social. Infrastructure and regulatory capacity is often minimal whilst mining operations have a major impact on national GDP.

De Beers through its diamond mining activities generates 30% of GDP and 50% of government revenue in Botswana. Resource rich countries are become increasingly protective of their natural assets as energy and precious materials become scarcer. South Africa, Zambia, Australia, Zimbabwe and Columbia have all put forward plans to secure a greater slice of the pie.

The challenge is for extractives companies to engage with local and national stakeholders and develop positive long term relationships in order to retain all important community consent for operations and overcome resource nationalism . Resources are finite and the onus is on mining companies to develop sustainable social investment initiatives which will survive long after mine closure.

For a more in depth rundown of key social and environmental risk challenges including the keystone xl debate and resource nationalism download a free 15-page briefing pack.

You can get your copy here.

For  further advice and best practice on social and environmental risk management for oil, gas and mining  take a look at the conference on "How to manage social and environmental risk for oil, gas and mining". With 25+ expert speakers and about 100 corporate attendees expected, it's the leading conference dealing with this topic in Europe with BP, Chevron, De Beers, Anglo American and IFC among the participants.

Click here for more info. - http://j.mp/socialenvironmentalriskmanagement

Reuters Events Sustainable Business

Reuters Events Sustainable Business

Reuters Events Sustainable Business has a mission to help businesses around the globe do the right thing by their customers and the world. We believe this is not only how to guarantee a future for all, but makes good business sense. We serve CSR, compliance, risk and governance communities with topical and insightful business intelligence and meeting places.

We provide business intelligence to more than 3,000 multinational companies every year. Our customers are also NGOs, think-tanks, academia, governments and consultancies. We publish the leading responsible business magazine, website, and research reports. Our conferences are widely recognised as the best in the field.

More from Reuters Events Sustainable Business