August 20, 2014

CSRWire.com The Corporate Social Responsibility Newswire

news by category

Can Corporate Sustainability & Economic Growth Coexist?


We chatted with SAP, BSR, CDP and 232 communicators.

Generating over 1,300 tweets.

9,437,880 impressions

&

Engaging over 377,000 Twitter accounts.

See more Analytics!

&

Let's chat!

Reversing Perception, Creating Impact:

We Chat with MGM's Executive Team!

MGM executive team

Generating 5.6 million impressions.

Engaging over 270,000 Twitter accounts.

With over 650 tweets.

mgm

See more Analytics!

&

Let's talk!

#BaBf: What Does it Mean to Brew a Better Future?

We chat LIVE with

Heineken

Generating 6.2 million impressions.

Engaging almost 300,000 Twitter accounts.

With  146 communicators.

And almost 800 tweets.

Heineken sustainability goals

See more Analytics!

&

Learn more about our Twitter Chats!

When Corporate Citizenship Integrates with Business Strategy: In Conversation with

HP Living ProgressGenerating 7.2 million impressions.

Engaging almost 1.3 million Twitter accounts.

With 193 communicators.

And almost 800 tweets.

See more Analytics!

&

Let's chat!


What Does it Mean
to Compete to be
Best FOR the
World?

We chatted LIVE
with:

Badger Balm, Indigenous Designs

Generating 8.1 million impressions.

With 128 communicators.

And almost 900 tweets.

See more Analytics!

&

Let's chat!

CSRwire Talkback

| join the conversation

Google's biggest CSR opportunity yet

The company's "Don't Be Evil" mantra should now include going conflict-free

Submitted by: Christine Bader

Posted: Aug 16, 2011 – 09:23 AM EST

Tags: conflict minerals, csr, telecomm, human rights, innovation, leadership, sustainability

 
Christine_bader

By Christine Bader

In the hype over how Google has up-ended the tech world with its purchase of Motorola Mobility, one aspect of the deal hasn’t yet attracted attention but is potentially the most important. Google entering the hardware business should lead to the one breakthrough the market truly needs: a smartphone free of conflict minerals.

All smartphones and most consumer electronic goods contain tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold. Tin is used to solder circuit boards; tantalum stores electricity; tungsten makes cellphones vibrate; gold is used in wiring. 

Most of these minerals come from the eastern Congo, which has been ravaged by conflict for years. Revenue from conflict minerals has kept warlords in power, and efforts to cut off that revenue have proven complex.

Google is uniquely positioned to tackle the problem. What company has a more relentless commitment to innovation? Google has already set aside $30 million for its Lunar X Prize. Surely avoiding complicity in human rights abuses is worth at least a fraction of that? 

What company wears its aspiration of “Don’t Be Evil” more prominently on its sleeve? Google took great pride in its decision to finally stop censoring search results on its Chinese language search engine last year, after three years of awkward interactions with Chinese authorities and Western critics.

Motorola Mobility is one of just six companies that earned a “Green: On the Right Track” rating from Raise Hope for Congo, which assessed the 21 largest electronics manufacturers on their progress towards conflict-free supply chains.

Motorola Mobility is also a member of the Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI), which two weeks ago launched a template with the Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition to help companies conduct and share due diligence on their smelters to ensure they’re conflict-free.

One hopes Google keeping Motorola Mobility’s leadership in place will mean ongoing support of engagement in this area. But Google should also immediately join GeSI and EICC and lead the battle against conflict minerals while putting its engineers to work on creating a smartphone that eradicates the need for those limited resources altogether.

Perhaps it is naive to think one company can solve a problem others have been working on for years. Has a single company ever had such a profound impact on people’s lives? Hang on, let me Google that...

Google states in its corporate principles, “We’re always looking for new places where we can make a difference. Ultimately, our constant dissatisfaction with the way things are becomes the driving force behind everything we do.”

If there is one thing Google should be dissatisfied with, it is that our dependence on smartphones makes us all complicit in human rights abuses. I, for one, would be the first in line for a Google device that is certified conflict-free.

About Christine Bader

Christine Bader is a Nonresident Senior Fellow at The Kenan Institute for Ethics at Duke University. Follow her on Twitter at @christinebader.

Readers: Will Google rise to meet the challenge and go conflict-free? Weigh in on Talkback!

The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by CSRwire contributors do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of CSRwire.

Search The Blog

Twitter

 

Issuers of news releases and not csrwire are solely responsible for the accuracy of the content