|
Corporate Social Responsibility
News
8.29.2007 - 02:51pm ET
|
CSR News from:
|
|
|
News Categories: |
| | |
Leading Socially Responsible and Religious Investing Groups to Organize Thousands to Oppose Sec Attack on Shareholder Rights
Social Investment Forum, Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility Unveil First Major Push to Stop SEC Proposals to Stifle Voices, Role of Shareholders.
(CSRwire) Listen
to August 29, 2007 news conference
WASHINGTON, D.C. - August 29, 2007 - The Social Investment Forum (SIF) and
the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (ICCR) today launched a
major new Web-based effort at www.SaveShareholderRights.org as part
of their campaign to oppose controversial proposals at the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) that would seriously undermine the rights of
investors.
The SIF/ICCR Web site aims to both: (1) enlist 500
institutions and financial professionals to sign a joint statement
opposing the SEC proposals; and
(2) help facilitate the filing of several thousand comments by individual
investors, with copies of the comments going both to the SEC and the
individual investors' elected members of the U.S. House and Senate.
The new
www.SaveShareholderRights.org is one of a number of efforts that will
be mounted by SIF, ICCR and other concerned groups and investors before
the comment period on the SEC proposals expires on October 2, 2007. The
new SIF/ICCR Web-based campaign aims to surpass by a significant margin
the 1997-1998 campaign in which more than 300 socially responsible,
religious, labor and other groups joined forces to oppose an earlier SEC
staff plan to gut the shareholder resolution process. The groups prevailed
in that fight and the SEC was forced to back down, withdrawing the widely
criticized proposal.
The customizable email comment for individual investors to send to the SEC
and Capitol Hill reads, in part, as follows: "I oppose any action by the
Securities and Exchange Commission to weaken the rights of Americans to
present resolutions for votes by the millions of investors like me who own
stock in companies. I urge the SEC and, if necessary, Congress to stop any
initiatives that would limit the rights of shareholders to sponsor proxy
resolutions or prevent investors from nominating members of corporate
boards. My bottom line here is simple: I believe that it would be better
for the SEC to take no action on their shareholder resolution initiatives
than it would be for the Commission to destroy the rights of shareholders.
I am worried that the SEC is on the wrong track."
SIF Board Chair and Senior Vice-President of Walden Asset Management Tim
Smith said: "We are investors and representatives of investors who take
seriously our rights and our responsibility to be engaged and informed as
shareowners of companies. We strongly oppose proposals at the SEC to
either eliminate the shareholder resolution process or make it more
difficult to sponsor resolutions. We also oppose any step to make it more
difficult for investors to help nominate directors.
Shareholder advocacy is vitally important in communicating with corporate
boards, management and other investors on key issues such as climate
change, governance reforms, employee diversity, executive compensation,
and human rights in overseas factories."
ICCR Executive Director Laura Berry said: "It is time for American
investors large and small to voice their concerns to the SEC and Congress.
As representatives of faith-based institutional investors, investment
managers and other allies, the members of the Interfaith Center on
Corporate Responsibility are deeply committed to protecting this important
link between morality and markets. We are united in our resolve to protect
our right to continue to be active owners of corporate America and we
intend to vigorously communicate our concerns to the SEC. We have worked
for over 35 years with companies, protecting and strengthening a process
that has served shareholders and publicly held corporations well."
"Shareholder resolutions are a critical tool for investors to ask
corporations to disclose the business risks of climate change and other
sustainability issues" said Chris Fox, investor programs director at
Ceres, a leading coalition of investors and environmental groups working
with companies to address environmental challenges such as global climate
change. "In more instances than not, shareholder resolutions have led
to productive dialogues and positive results with companies. Without
resolutions prodding companies to act, the vitally important issue of
climate change would not have attained the prominence it has."
The institutional/financial professional sign-on statement at
www.SaveShareholderRights.org spells out specific concerns: "The SEC
has issued three specific proposals which we believe would eliminate or
cripple the resolution process. We cannot support the following proposals:
(1) the 'opt-out' option that would allow the most unresponsive companies
-- those with the worst records when it comes to good corporate conduct
and governance -- to drop out of the shareholder resolution process and
isolate themselves further from their shareholders; (2) the unilateral
substitution of the electronic petition model or 'chat room' for the
vibrant and public 14a-8 shareholder resolution process; and (3) the
raising of shareholder resolution resubmission levels from the current 3%,
6% and 10% vote levels to 10%, 15% and 20% levels, thus effectively killing
many important shareholder resolutions."
The sign-on statement continues: "We also support the right of investors
to nominate board members using the proxy process and urge the SEC to have
a reasonable level of shares required for the nomination process. Under one
approach raised by the SEC, such shareholder involvement would be barred
outright, whereas another approach outlined by the Commission is so
onerous as to make such involvement all but impossible."
On July 25, 2007, the SEC put out for public comment two proposals that
would open the door to a substantial weakening of shareholder rights in
the proxy process and in the selection of board members. SIF held a news
conference on July 24, 2007 to warn that any SEC proposals that weakened
shareholder rights would be strongly opposed by concerned investors.
ABOUT SIF, ICCR AND CERES
The Social Investment Forum (http://www.socialinvest.org) is the
national membership association for the social investment industry. It is
dedicated to the concept, practice, and growth of socially responsible
investing. The Forum's 500-plus members include financial planners, banks,
mutual fund companies, research companies, foundations, and community
investing institutions.
The Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (http://www.iccr.org) is a coalition of
nearly 300 faith-based institutional investors, representing over $100
billion in invested capital. ICCR members bridge the divide between
morality and markets by envisioning a civic economy that integrates
ethical, environmental and social values. Inspired by faith, committed to
action, ICCR members work to build a just and sustainable global
community.
Ceres is a leading coalition of investors, environmental groups and other
public interest organizations working with companies to address
sustainability challenges such as climate change. Ceres also directs the
Investor Network on Climate Risk, a network of 60 institutional investors
managing $4 trillion in assets focused on the business impacts of climate
change. For more information, visit http://www.ceres.org
EDITOR'S NOTE:A streaming audio recording of the related
news event will be available on the Web as of 6 p.m. EDT on August 29,
2007 at http://www.saveshareholderrights.org/news.cfm.
|
|