|
Corporate Social Responsibility
News
5.09.2007 - 08:05am ET
|
CSR News from:
|
|
|
News Category:
|
|
Most Companies Lack an Energy Strategy, Research Shows
Chief Energy Officer Needed to Manage Return on Environment
(CSRwire) NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 9, 2007--While a majority of senior
technology leaders from around the globe (82 percent) closely monitor the
issue of global warming, most do not have a defined energy strategy to
deal with it (65 percent), according to a new global survey released by
Hill & Knowlton, Inc. In fact, more than three quarters of business
decision makers surveyed (77 percent) believe there is a need to expand
the C-Suite to include a Chief Energy Officer (CNO) to manage, implement
and measure a company's return on investment in environmental technology,
the so-called Return on Environment (ROE).
The survey, conducted by global communications consultancy Hill &
Knowlton and polling partner Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates, examined
the viewpoints of 420 senior business decision makers involved in IT
purchases from the United States, UK, China and Canada to determine how
they go about integrating economics and ethics when it comes to
environmental issues. The results provide invaluable insights for
companies as they formulate their own environmental communications
strategies that go beyond traditional marketing and communications, or
corporate reputation techniques.
"Despite the hype, few companies are plotting a measurable action plan
to drive return on environment," said Joe Paluska, head of Hill &
Knowlton's Worldwide Technology Practice. "While the overwhelming majority
looks to the CEO to own the issue, nearly two-thirds of those polled said
no one within their organizations is tasked with defining the company's
energy strategy. We expect reputation, risk and return to suffer until
companies really stand up and take charge and industry as a whole sets the
standard for measuring return on environment."
Defining a corporate energy strategy
Of those polled, 77 percent of Chinese respondents said their firms
have not yet defined an energy strategy. The US came in second at 67
percent, followed by Canada (62 percent) and the UK (51 percent).
When it comes to the question of who is responsible for defining a
company's energy strategy, again, the results echo similar uncertainty.
Sixty-five percent of those polled do not have anyone identified within
their organization tasked with defining an energy strategy. In China, such
an organizational role is almost unheard of,
with 82 percent of respondents indicating that no one in their company is
responsible for developing an energy strategy. The United States fared
only slightly better, with 70 percent, and the UK is farthest ahead with
more than half of the companies polled (57 percent) having someone in
place to define their energy strategy.
"The research suggests that there is an opportunity to expand the
c-suite to include a Chief Energy Officer," Paluska said. "There's a
growing need for corporate accountability on energy performance as
companies grapple with increasing complexity and expectations of
governments, customers, shareholders and employees. Ultimately, companies
will need to quantify the return on the triple bottom line -- people,
profits and planet -- or their reputation and valuation will suffer."
"Return on Environment"
When asked how best to measure Return on Environment, more than half
of the survey respondents (52 percent) identified improved corporate
reputation as the most important return on investment for environmental
programs. Actual carbon emission reduction was the most important metric
to 38 percent of respondents globally, and was rated
number one in the UK. More traditional measurements -- such as return on
equity, total cost of ownership and internal rate of return -- also scored
reasonably well. However, it is clear that much work still remains to be
done to accurately determine Return on Environment in a way in which
consumers, investors and policy-makers can universally
validate.
While there are no clear winners in the race to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions, the "green arms race," the United States, Japan and Germany
were identified as the top three countries likely to contribute the most
to clean tech breakthroughs in the coming years. Not surprisingly, people
believe it is their own country that is most likely to play the largest
role in developing clean tech solutions. The exception to this nationalist
trend was China, where 62 percent of those surveyed see the United States
as leading the clean tech debate rather than their home nation.
Opinions on which industries are most likely to benefit from clean
tech innovations also vary by country. More than half of the Canadian
respondents (55 percent) view the transportation industry as having the
most to gain, U.S. and British respondents view venture capitalists as
benefiting, and executives from China think policy-makers will be the
clean tech jackpot winners.
Methodology
Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates conducted a survey of 420 senior
business decision-makers involved in IT purchases from 19 March - 20 April
2007. The interviews were conducted in the United States, UK, Canada and
China. All respondents worked in companies with revenues of US$100 million
and over (or local country equivalent outside of the
US), with half of the companies defined as Fortune 1000 (or equivalent
outside of the US). The survey was conducted by using telephone, online
and face-to-face interviews.
Hill & Knowlton's clean tech survey results are available online at www.hillandknowlton.com/roe.
About Hill & Knowlton
Hill & Knowlton, Inc. is a leading international communications
consultancy, providing services to local, multinational and global
clients. The firm is based in New York, with 71 offices in 38 countries,
as well as an extensive associate network. The agency is part of WPP Group
plc (NASDAQ:WPPGY), one of the world's largest communications services
groups.
About Penn, Shoen & Berland Associates
Penn, Schoen and Berland Associates (PSB) has nearly 30 years of
experience in leveraging consumer opinion to provide clients with a
competitive advantage, or more simply -- providing clients with Winning
Knowledge(TM). PSB executes polling and message testing services in over
70 countries for Fortune(R)500 companies and major political campaigns to
develop brand positioning, guide successful advertising campaigns,
generate favorable publicity, and advise in crisis management
decisions.
Copyright Business Wire 2007
|
|