|
Corporate Social Responsibility
News
4.03.2003 ET
|
CSR News from:
|
|
|
News Category:
|
|
Treasurers Express Concern About Risks to Investments from Climate Change
CT Treasurer to call for institutional investors summit to examine climate risk.
CT, New York State, New York City likely to vote proxies on global warming resolutions
(CSRwire) NEW YORK, NY - Four state and city treasurers and comptrollers,
representing approximately $190 billion in investments, today expressed
concern about the risks of climate change to long-term investments, and
announced plans to hold a summit with other institutional investors to
examine the issue.
Denise Nappier, Treasurer, State of Connecticut; William C. Thompson,Jr.,
Comptroller, City of New York; Alan Hevesi, Comptroller, New York State;
and Jeb Spaulding, Treasurer, State of Vermont, all expressed concern that
global warming posed long-term economic risks that threatened the value of
retirement funds. They made the announcements at the CERES conference, a
gathering of investors, environmentalists, analysts, and business leaders
being held April 1 and 2 in New York City.
Treasurer Nappier, and Comptroller Hevesi also indicated that funds they
represented would likely vote their proxies in favor of shareholder
resolutions filed this year against portfolio companies requesting
disclosure of and plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Comptroller
Thompson, as chief investment adviser to five New York City funds,
indicated that he would recommend they vote their proxies in favor of the
resolutions.
In a series of speeches at the conference, the officials cited a variety
of potential risks posed by climate change, from damages caused by climate
change itself, to future potential regulatory scenarios, competitive
pressures in development of new technology, and potential future legal
liabilities for heavy emitters of greenhouse gas. In her speech on
Tuesday, Treasurer Nappier announced plans to hold an institutional
investors' summit to examine the issue further.
"All funds, but particularly pension funds, have a responsibility to their
shareholders to be sure that they're adequately assessing risk in their
portfolio companies." Treasurer Nappier (CT) said. "These resolutions
should serve as a notice that we will not tolerate irresponsible corporate
behavior that could potentially undermine the integrity and soundness of
our pension funds and the health of our planet and its people. We need to
pull corporate America's heads from the sand and look at this obvious
long-term economic risk. In my view, institutional investors are in a
position to lead that effort."
"It's not hard to see that global warming is going to have an effect on
many sectors of our economy. As we see disruptions in water supply,
changing agricultural seasons, insurance losses and rising premiums from
severe storms, and other changes, we know that all has associated costs,"
Alan Hevesi, New York State Controller, said. "CEOs in charge now might
not be around to see all those costs hit, but retirees will be. It's my
job to watch out for risks on the horizon to keep New York's investments
solid and strong over the next twenty or thirty years."
"In 1989, we helped found CERES because we recognized that many
environmental issues pose long-term risks to business if not managed
properly," William Thompson, New York City Comptroller said. "Climate
change is a prime example of that kind of long-term risk, and yet there is
little movement to address it."
Jeb Spaulding, Treasurer of Vermont, expressed support for Nappier's
proposal for a summit to examine the relationship between climate and
portfolio risk:
"Fund managers are routinely asked questions about how large scale trends
are likely to affect a portfolio," said Treasurer Spaulding. "Climate
change is the definition of a large scale trend. I would be interested in
our fund managers' views on the way in which climate risk should be
evaluated in our long term portfolio strategy."
A record 31 "global warming" resolutions were filed against 27 companies
this year, primarily with companies from heavily-emitting sectors such as
auto, electric utilities, oil and gas, and manufacturing. The resolutions
requested disclosure of, and in some cases plans to reduce, greenhouse gas
emissions. The average support level for these resolutions has more than
doubled since 2000, rising to an average18.8 percent support level in
2002.
The State of Connecticut was the primary filer of one such resolution
against American Electric Power (AEP), the largest single emitter of
greenhouse gases in the world. Treasurer Nappier explained her state's
concern:
"In American Electric Power's own disclosure to the SEC they acknowledge
climate change as a risk factor," said Treasurer Nappier. "And yet, they,
like most companies, haven't presented to their shareholders a
comprehensive assessment of these risks and how they plan to address
them."
Properly submitted shareholder resolutions appear in company proxy
statements, which are circulated to all shareowners in advance of a
company's annual meeting. Though such resolutions are not binding, they
prompt top executives and board members to draft and approve statements in
response (and almost always in opposition) to these proposals. For some
companies, such proxy statements provide the most detailed and current
assessment available to shareholders on the global warming issue.
The global warming shareholder campaign is one of the longest running
since the South Africa divestment campaign of the 1970s and 1980s--and is
fast becoming one of the most widely supported as well. Pension fund
concern was a cornerstone of the movement to divest from apartheid-era
South Africa.
Robert Massie, Senior Fellow, CERES, and author of Loosing the Bonds, The
United States and South Africa, compared the divestment movement to
current rising investor concerns about global warming:
"With South Africa, we saw a similar situation where the U.S. government
had decided not to deal with the issue and so Wall Street decided not to
be concerned," Massie said. "But then individual state funds began to ask
their fund managers to examine the issue, and gradually there was a
nationwide move toward consensus to divest. That's happening now with
global warming- this issue is not going to disappear."
Mindy Lubber, Executive Director, CERES, explained the funds' concern
about climate risk:
"Climate risk is pervasive, global, volatile, and inexorable -- the very
definition of long-term risk. No fund manager could deny that it will
have some impact on the market value of a portfolio. The question is how
much."
Background: 2003 Global Warming Resolutions
OIL & GAS
Going to a vote: ChevronTexaco, ExxonMobil (4 pending), Petro-Canada,
Imperial Oil
Omitted: ConocoPhilips (Withdrawn because results achieved), Occidental,
Encana, Nexen
AUTOMOTIVE
Ford, General Motors
ELECTRIC POWER
American Electric Power, PG&E, Southern Company,
Omitted: Cinergy, Excel
OTHER COMPANIES
Citigroup, Gillette,Weyerhauser, General Electric
Withdrawn because results achieved: Cummins, Caterpillar, United
Technologies, Marsh & McLennan, Reebok, Staples
Withdrawn because CEO resigned: Sprint
For more information please visit the CERES website, www.ceres.org
|
|